We tested benchmarks, battery life, and thermal performance on the ultra-thin and lightweight Acer Swift Air 16 notebook, equipped with an AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 series processor.



I was able to borrow the ' Swift Air 16, ' an ultra-lightweight and thin notebook PC weighing only 990g and equipped with an AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 series processor, from Acer. Following

my exterior check , I then ran some benchmarks.

Acer Swift Air 16 | Ultra-thin and lightweight laptop | Acer Japan
https://www.acer.com/jp-ja/laptops/swift/swift-air-16

The appearance and weight of the Swift Air 16 have already been checked in the following article.

A photo review of the ultra-lightweight and ultra-thin 'Acer Swift Air 16' notebook PC, weighing just 990g - GIGAZINE



First, let's check the device specifications. According to ' CPU-Z ', the CPU is an Intel Core Ultra X7 358H MMD Ryzen AI 7 350, which has 8 cores and 16 GHz.



The memory is LRDDR5 32GB.



According to

GPU-Z , the GPU is an AMD Radeon 860M graphics card with approximately 512MB of VRAM.



According to CrystalDiskInfo , the storage is a PCI Express 4.0 x4 connected NVMe SSD with a capacity of 1TB. It was manufactured by TWSC (Shenzhen Techwinsemi Technology).



CrystalDiskMark was used to measure the read and write speeds of the storage device. The sequential read speed was 3558.53 MB/s, the sequential write speed was 3482.00 MB/s, the random read speed was 388.38 MB/s, and the random write speed was 378.38 MB/s.



According to '

BatteryInfoView ,' the battery capacity was 50364mWh.



When I ran

CrystalMark Retro , the overall score was 18258, the CPU single-core score was 11060, and the multi-core score was 82754.



Next, we measured the performance using '

Geekbench 6 '. The CPU benchmark single-core score was 1918, and the multi-core score was 8486. According to the official Geekbench chart , the single-core performance is roughly equivalent to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, and the multi-core performance is roughly equivalent to the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT.



The GPU benchmark score was 18282 in OpenCL. According to

the official chart , this score is roughly equivalent to that of the Radeon Pro 560X and GeForce GTX 960.



I scored 22511 on Vulkan. Referring to

the official chart , this is slightly lower than the GeForce GTX 960.



Next, we ran '

Passmark PerformanceTest V11 '. The XPS 14's overall score was '5262', which is 50% of the benchmark scores obtained by users worldwide, right in the middle.



The CPU score was '17802,' placing it at the 52% percentile.



The 2D score is '667,' placing it at the 50th percentile.



The 3D score was 4592, which is 33%, below the median.



The memory score was 2409, placing it in the 32% percentile.



The disk score was 27484, which is 73%.



Next, I ran

the FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION benchmark with three settings: lightweight, normal, and high quality, and four resolutions: 1280x720, 1980x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160.



The results are as follows: At 1280x720 resolution, high quality settings were judged as 'somewhat heavy,' and at 1920x1080 resolution, normal quality settings were judged as 'difficult to run.' Furthermore, at 2560x1440 resolution, normal quality and above were judged as 'difficult to operate,' and at 3840x2160 resolution, high quality settings resulted in the benchmark freezing or the benchmark software crashing during the run, making measurement impossible. As expected given the low GPU performance, the Swift Air 16 does not seem to be very suitable for gaming.

Lightweight quality normal quality high quality
1280×720 5887 (Somewhat comfortable) 4424 (Normal) 2785 (slightly heavy)
1920×1080 3804 (Normal) 2854 (somewhat heavy) 2050 (heavy)
2560×1440 2608 (somewhat heavy) 1909 (difficult to operate) 1513 (difficult to operate)
3840×2160 1424 (difficult to operate) 1003 (difficult to operate) Unmeasurable


I tried encoding Blender's demo movie '

Tears of Steel
' (3840×1714, 24fps, 8-bit, H.264/AVC, Apple QuickTime, 12 minutes 14 seconds playback time) in H.265 and AV1 using the video editing software DaVinci Resolve. The export time was 4 minutes 25 seconds for H.265 and 4 minutes 21 seconds for AV1.



We also measured the performance using the benchmark tool '

Puget Bench 2.0 ' which utilizes DaVinci Resolve. The score was 29482.



For reference, Apple's MacBook Pro with the M3 Max chip sold for 139,583.



The results of each measurement are as follows.



I used

Geekbench AI Pro to measure AI performance. Using DirectML, Microsoft's high-performance GPU/NPU hardware acceleration library for Windows, under the ONNX framework, the Single Precision Score was '5647', the Half Precision Score was '8678', and the Quantized Score was '4517'.



When measured using the CPU & ONNX framework, the Single Precision Score was '3324', the Half Precision Score was '1725', and the Quantized Score was '7096'.



We measured the temperature after continuously playing the FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION benchmark at 1920x1080 resolution and standard quality for 2 hours on a loop using the '

HIKMICRO Mini2Plus V2 '. The keyboard area with the case open recorded a maximum temperature of 45.1℃ at the hinge.



Because the exhaust fan is located at the bottom, there wasn't much temperature rise observed on the top surface.



The bottom of the laptop seems to cool very well, probably due to the large, wide fan; even after two hours, the bottom temperature only reached a maximum of 33.2°C. It's so light that you barely notice its thickness even when it's on your lap.



We tested the FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION benchmark at 1920x1080 resolution and standard quality on a loop setting, with the volume at 50%, screen brightness at 50%, and keyboard backlight off, and measured how long the battery lasted from a 100% charge. The result was that the battery ran out in about 2 hours and 15 minutes. The official battery life is about 8 hours for video playback, and of course, actual work doesn't seem to consume as much battery as the benchmark loop playback.



I was bothered by the noise from the large fan on the bottom, so I measured it with

a GainExpress SLM-441 digital sound level meter. I took the measurement about 10cm away from the hinge and checked how much the sound level changed from when the fan was not spinning to when it was spinning.



The noise level was around 33 dB when the fan wasn't running, but it rose to 41-42 dB when the fan started. In reality, there was a slight 'humming' sound from the wind, but it was only noticeable in a quiet place and not loud enough to make it difficult to concentrate on work.



The Swift Air 16 is characterized by its lightness and portability. In terms of specifications, it's sufficient for general tasks, and it seems to handle video editing without any problems. However, the GPU is quite weak, and it doesn't seem to be good at creative uses that heavily utilize the GPU, such as playing games or rendering 3D. The battery life is sufficient, but it drains very quickly depending on the task. The cooling performance is excellent, and it doesn't get hot even after prolonged use, and the design prevents heat buildup.

The Acer Swift Air 16 is priced at 259,800 yen at Acer's official store.

Acer Swift Air 16 Windows 11 Home 32GB Memory 1TB SSD 16-inch WUXGA IPS Anti-Glare AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 Radeon 860M Magnesium Aluminum Alloy Thin and Lightweight 990g 13-Hour Battery Life 2.07MP IR Webcam Slide Cover WiFi 6E Copilot+PC Backlit Japanese Keyboard SFA16-61M-F73Z | Acer Official Online Store Acer Japan Online Store
https://store.acer.com/ja-jp/acer-sfa16-61m-f73z

in Hardware,   Review, Posted by log1i_yk