An OpenAI researcher posted that 'GPT-5 has solved an unsolved mathematical problem,' but it turned out that the problem had already been solved, leading to ridicule from rival developers, including Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis.

OpenAI has posted that it has solved several unsolved mathematical problems, ' Erdős' problems, ' posed by Paul Erdős , known as 'the mathematician who wrote the most papers in the 20th century.' However, it has become clear that it has simply searched through the literature for solutions to problems that have already been solved, leading to ridicule from rival AI developers.
Leading OpenAI researcher announced a GPT-5 math breakthrough that never happened
https://the-decoder.com/leading-openai-researcher-announced-a-gpt-5-math-breakthrough-that-never-happened/

OpenAI's 'embarrassing' math | TechCrunch
https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/19/openais-embarrassing-math/
On October 18, 2025, Kevin Weil, Chief Product Officer at OpenAI, posted, ' GPT-5 has solved 10 previously unsolved Erdős problems! It has also made progress on 11 other problems.' Weil claims that the problems solved by GPT-5 had been unsolved for decades. At the time of writing, Weil's post has been deleted.
Replying to a VP of science at OpenAI.
— Stefan Schubert (@StefanFSchubert) October 17, 2025
Be sceptical of these types of claims. https://t.co/zc95OyEdPj pic.twitter.com/OmKQh8iH4D
Echoing Weyl, other researchers at OpenAI have also touted GPT-5's ability to solve unsolved mathematical problems. 'GPT-5 Pro is superhuman at literature search,' OpenAI computer scientist Sebastian Bubeck wrote in a post. 'It solved the Erdős problem, listed as unsolved in the official database , by realizing that it had already been solved 20 years ago.'
gpt5-pro is superhuman at literature search:
— Sebastien Bubeck (@SebastienBubeck) October 12, 2025
it just solved Erdos Problem #339 (listed as open in the official database https://t.co/3vCCCR0cXs ) by realizing that it had actually been solved 20 years ago
h/t @MarkSellke for pointing this out to me! pic.twitter.com/6Ma2a07MnX
In response to Bubeck's post, Mark Selke, Associate Professor of Statistics at Harvard University, said, 'Using thousands of queries from GPT-5, we have found solutions to 10 Erdős problems that were listed as unsolved. The 10 we solved are 223, 339, 494, 515, 621, 822, 883 (Part 2/2), 903, 1043, and 1079. In addition, for 11 other problems (32, 167, 188, 750, 788, 811, 827, 829, 1017, 1011, and 1041), GPT-5 found significant partial progress that we added to the official website. Regarding 827, there was actually an error in Erdős's original paper, and Martinez and Roldán Pensado's research explains this and corrects the argument. The future of scientific research will be exciting.'
Update: Mehtaab and I pushed further on this. Using thousands of GPT5 queries, we found solutions to 10 Erdős problems that were listed as open: 223, 339, 494, 515, 621, 822, 883 (part 2/2), 903, 1043, 1079.
— Mark Sellke (@MarkSellke) October 17, 2025
Additionally for 11 other problems, GPT5 found significant partial… https://t.co/ocqQPhVZl2
In response, OpenAI's Boris Power said, 'Wow, we've finally made some major progress on a previously unsolvable problem!'
Wow, finally large breakthroughs at previously unsolved problems!! https://t.co/ONiaPfEP4x
— Boris Power (@BorisMPower) October 17, 2025
However, mathematician Thomas Bloom, who runs the official Erdős Problems database, quickly refuted the OpenAI researchers' post, explaining that the problems listed on the site as unsolved were problems he personally didn't know how to solve, and were not actually unsolved.
Hi, as the owner/maintainer of https://t.co/69gOJM7Ci7 , this is a dramatic misrepresentation. GPT-5 found references, which solved these problems, that I personally was unaware of.
— Thomas Bloom (@thomasfbloom) October 17, 2025
The 'open' status only means I personally am unaware of a paper which solves it.
In response, Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, a competitor to OpenAI, said, 'This is embarrassing.'
this is embarrassing
— Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) October 18, 2025
After Bloom's post, Bubeck wrote, 'I have deleted my original post. I obviously did not intend to mislead anyone. I thought my wording was clear, and I apologize. I only found solutions in the literature. That's all. And knowing how difficult it is to research the literature, this feels very accelerated.' He apologized for posting as if GPT-5 had independently generated proofs for difficult mathematical problems, and deleted the post.
I deleted the post, I didn't mean to mislead anyone obviously, I thought the phrasing was clear, sorry about that. Only solutions in the literature were found that's it, and I find this very accelerating because I know how hard it is to search the literature.
— Sebastien Bubeck (@SebastienBubeck) October 18, 2025
In response to Bubeck's apology, Yann LeCun, Meta's chief AI scientist, wrote that he had been 'caught up in his own GPTards' (a slang term used to mock those who espouse excessive belief in AI tools such as ChatGPT).
Hoisted by their own GPTards
— Yann LeCun (@ylecun) October 18, 2025
Related Posts:
in Software, Posted by logu_ii







